IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 12, December 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Characterization Of Soft Bending Actuator For High Bending Angle

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Mariam Md Ghazaly, Muhammad Izzat Mohd Jahid

 

KEYWORDS

Bending angle, design optimization, FEM analysis, pneumatic actuator, soft actuator, soft robotics, soft pneumatic.

 

ABSTRACT

In these previous years, it has been reported that machinery has caused injuries and deaths in the industries. Machineries consist of moving mechanical parts that are mostly actuated by hard conventional actuators. Using conventional actuators could result in injuries, leading to complications during human robot interaction. Due to their hard physical features, it is difficult to implement conventional actuators in various environments except in industry. Due to such difficulties, these issues are mitigated by introducing soft actuators. Soft actuators are built out of soft materials similar to silicon and are actuated when air pressure is introduced as well as on inflating the internal fluidic channel. This results in the soft actuator to create a bending motion. Such types of actuators include a broad range of application; however, the issue here would be to control the bending motion pertaining to the soft actuator, and thus this warrants an analysis for such types of actuators. This research aims to design and characterize two classes of soft bending actuator by employing FEM analysis in order to optimize the bending motion pertaining to two classes of soft bending actuator. Two types of soft actuator designs were analyze, i.e. the (i) PneuNets soft bending actuator and (ii) Fibre-reinforced bending actuator. For both designs, optimization was done via Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis using Abaqus software by varying three parameters, i.e.: (i) height of chamber, (ii) length of chamber and (iii) width of chamber/ fiber angle. The FEM analysis shows that the fibre-reinforced soft actuator exhibit higher bending motion, 217.5mm in compared to PneuNets soft bending actuator, 160.9mm respectively. The bending motion can also be controlled direction by varying the fibre angle in the fibre-reinforced actuator. This gives the fibre-reinforced actuator a broader range of motion in compared to PneuNets actuator.

 

REFERENCES

[1] P. Polygerinos et al., “Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 778–789, 2015.
[2] S.M. Marsh and D.E. Fosbroke, “Trends of occupational fatalities involving machines, United States,” Am. J. Ind. Med., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1160–1173, 2015.
[3] D. Rus and M.T. Tolley, “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 467–475, 2015.
[4] T. Giffney et al., “Soft pneumatic bending actuator with integrated carbon nanotube displacement sensor,” Robotics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016.
[5] K. Elgeneidy, N. Lohse, and M. Jackson, “Bending angle prediction and control of soft pneumatic actuators with embedded flex sensors – A data-driven approach,” Mechatronics, vol. 50, no. November 2016, pp. 234–247, 2016.
[6] F. Connolly, P. Polygerinos, C.J. Walsh, and K. Bertoldi, “Mechanical programming of soft actuators by varying fiber angle,” Soft Robot., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2015.
[7] A. Zolfagharian, A.Z. Kouzani, S.Y. Khoo, B. Nasri-Nasrabadi, and A. Kaynak, “Development and analysis of a 3D printed hydrogel soft actuator,” Sensors Actuators, A Phys., vol. 265, pp. 94–101, 2017.
[8] C.D. Onal, X. Chen, G.M. Whitesides, and D. Rus, “Soft mobile robots with on-board chemical pressure generation,” Springer Tracts Adv. Robot., vol. 100, pp. 525–540, 2017.
[9] W. Chen, C. Xiong, C. Liu, P. Li, and Y. Chen, “Fabrication and Dynamic Modeling of Bidirectional Bending Soft Actuator Integrated with Optical Waveguide Curvature Sensor,” Soft Robot., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 495–506, 2019.
[10] “EcoflexTM 00-50 Product Information | Smooth-On, Inc.” [Online]. Available: https://www.smooth-on.com/products/ecoflex-00-50/. [Accessed: 24-Nov-2019].
[11] “ELASTOSIL® RT 622 A/B Wacker Polymers.” [Online]. Available: https://plastics.ulprospector.com/datasheet/e232324/elastosil-rt-622-a-b. [Accessed: 24-Nov-2019].
[12] “EcoflexTM 00-30 Product Information | Smooth-On, Inc.” [Online]. Available: https://www.smooth-on.com/products/ecoflex-00-30/. [Accessed: 24-Nov-2019].
[13] H.R. Choi et al., “Biomimetic soft actuator: Design, modeling, control, and applications,” IEEE Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 581–593, 2005.
[14] M. Manti, V. Cacucciolo, and M. Cianchetti, “Stiffening in soft robotics: A review of the state of the art,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 93–106, 2016.
[15] N. Lin et al., “IMU-Based Active Safe Control of a Variable Stiffness Soft Actuator,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1247–1254, 2019.
[16] K. Elgeneidy, N. Lohse, and M. Jackson, “Experimental analysis of the bending response of soft gripper fingers,” Proc. ASME Des. Eng. Tech. Conf., vol. 5B-2016, pp. 1–10, 2016.