International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 12, December 2020 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

E-Government Initiative: Port Paperless Operations In Ghana: 280th Iier National Conference, 27th -28th February 2020, Montreal Canada, Pages 4-7.

[Full Text]



James Yaw Osei – Owusu, Rosli Mahmood, Murali Sambasivan.



Paperless System, Port, Ghana, UTAUT.



Ghana has two main seaports namely; Tema harbour and Takoradi harbour. As a developing country, it relies on these two ports for revenue, foreign exchange and employment. Over the past decades these ports have undertaken a lot of reforms all with the hope of ensuring that its operations become standardized with world operations in order to remain competitive and meet international standards that conform to world trade facilitation agreement. In view of this the government in 1st September, 2017, introduced the Port Paperless System (PPS) at its ports for the clearing of goods and also for all port related business. The introduction of this PPS was meant to improve the trade competitiveness of Ghana and also help avert challenges such as in explicable charges, delays, lack of transparency, bureaucracy and complexity in port operations that have been attributed to all past port reforms. However, barley after a year of its operations a lot of studies have revealed many challenges, ranging from stakeholders acceptance to issues related to information technology support. This paper attempts to delve into the PPS operations using a modified version of the UTAUT model in order to enhance its acceptability amongst all the stakeholders within the port sector of Ghana.



[1] Agbozo, E. (2017). Going paperless in the public sector: An exposition on Ghana’s ports. Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(9), 2229-5518.
[2] Almarabeh, T. and Abu Ali, A. (2010). A General Framework for E-Government: Definition Maturity Challenges, Opportunities, and Success. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39, 29-42.
[3] Alshehri, M. (2012).Using the UTAUT model to determine factors affecting acceptance and use of e -government services in the United Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Published doctoral dissertation, Griffith University.
[4] Amanfu, H. (2010). The introduction of off-dock terminals and their impact on cargo clearance operations in the Tema port– focus on shippers.
[5] Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices.
[6] Campeau, D.R. & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self –efficacy: Development of measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 182 – 211.
[7] Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[8] DeLone, W.H. & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 60-95.
[9] Fang, Z. (2002). E –government in digital era: Concept, practice and development. Journal of the Computer and Internet Management, 10(2), 1- 22.
[10] Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X. & Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services. Internet Research, Vol.17, No. 4, pp. 378-401.
[11] Heilig, L. Schwarze, S. &Voß, S. (2017). An analysis of digital transformation in the history and future of modern ports. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (in press). IEEE
[12] Hung, S.Y., Chang, C.M. & Yu, T.J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 97-122.
[13] Lin, J.C.C & Lu, H. (2011). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intentions to use a website. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), pp. 197 – 208.
[14] Mohammed, F., Ibrahim, O., & Ithnin, N., (2016). Factors influencing cloud computing adoption for e-government implementation in developing countries: Instrument development. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 18 Issue: 3, pp.297-327.
[15] Mondragon, A. E. C., Mondragon, C. E. C., & Coronado, E. S. (2017). ICT adoption in multimodal transport sites: investigating institutional-related influences in international seaports terminals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 97, 69-88.
[16] Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Aggression in the workplace. Antisocial behavior in organizations, 37, 67.
[17] Sambasivan, M., Patrick Wemys, G., & Che Rose, R. (2010). User acceptance of a G2B system: A case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Research, 20(2), 169-187.
[18] Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach, John Willey &Sons. Inc. New York.
[19] Sindeu, E., (2013). Implementation of e-government in Cameroon.
[20] 7TH ANNUAL E- GOVERNMENT FORUM. http://www.cto.int/media/events/pst-ev/2013/e-Gove/Eric%20Sindeu.pdf.
[21] Torres, L., Pina, V., and Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU Cities. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 217-38.
[22] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 425-78.
[23] Zikmund, A., Ripka, P., Krasny, L., Judl, T., & Jahoda, D. (2010). Biofilm detection by the impedance method. In 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (Vol. 4, pp. 1432-1434). IEEE.