|
The Differences Ability In Writing Descriptive Texts By Using Chain Writing And Conventional Methods
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Karto, Suhartono, Susetyo, Noermanzah, Ira Maisarah
KEYWORDS
differences, chain writing methods, conventional methods, writing descriptive texts.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the differences ability in writing descriptive texts by using chain writing and conventional methods at Class VII of State Junior High School Mulyoharjo, Musi Rawas Regency. The research method used was pure experimental methods with the design of the difference test between two free samples or independent t-test. Data collection techniques used were test techniques with the type of test writing description text. Data analysis techniques were done with the following steps: grading scores, calculating students' average scores, homogeneity tests, data normality tests, and hypothesis testing assisted with SPSS 20. The results of the study showed that there were significant differences ability in writing descriptive text between chain writing and conventional methods at Class VII of State Junior High School Mulyoharjo, Musi Rawas Regency. This was indicated by the value of Sig. (2-tailed) two-way by the score of 0,000 <0.05, so that Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted, then the hypothesis was accepted or the average of students’ ability in writing descriptive texts by using chain writing method was higher than conventional methods Class VII of State Junior High School Mulyoharjo, Musi Rawas Regency.
REFERENCES
[1] Calon, D. R. & Soesetyo, B. H. (2017). Hasil Menulis Karangan Sederhana Peserta Didik Kelas X IPA 2 SMAN 1 Driyorejo dengan Metode Chain Writing. Laterne, 6 (2), 2-4.
[2] Dalman, H. (2014). Keterampilan Menulis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
[3] Dorowanti, R. (2011) Penerapan Pembelajaran Menulis Deskripsi Menggunakan Metode Chain Writing Siswa Kelas VIIA di SMPN Jember. JP3, 1 (2), 79.
[4] Fitriyanti, R. & Setyaningtias, E. W. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Chain Writing terhadap Hasil Belajar Menulis Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(3), 276. doi:10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i3.p276-282
[5] Kadir. (2015). Statistika Terapan: Konsep, Contoh dan Analisis Data dengan Program SPSS/Lisrel dalam Penelitian. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
[6] Mackenzie, N., & Veresov, N. (2013). How Drawing can Support Writing Acquisition: Text Costraction in Early Writing from a Vygotskian Perpective. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4) 23-24.
[7] Maisarah, Ira. 2016. Developing Reading and Writing Assessment for Seventh Grade Students of SMP in Merangin District based on School based Curriculum. Proceeding of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4). Vol 4. Nomor 1. Pg. 420-429. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/ article/view/6953/5487
[8] Noermanzah, N., Abid, S., & Septaria, S. (2018). Improving the Ability of Writing a Narrative Charge by Using Animated Images Media Student Class V.B SD Negeri 17 Lubuklinggau. BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(2 Juli), 116. doi:10.21009/bahtera.172.9
[9] Nurgiyantoro, B. (2001). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
[10] Rustam, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Statistik. Kolaka: Putri Yolanda.
[11] Sudiati, V. & Widyamartaya, A. (2005). Kiat Menulis Deskripsi dan Narasi: Lukisan dan Cerita. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.
[12] Suhartono. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Menulis Karangan. Bengkulu: Unit Penerbitan Universitas Bengkulu.
[13] Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
[14] Zaenudin, T. (2015). Pembelajaran Mengarang Deskripsi di Sekolah Dasar: Buku Penunjang Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas IV SD/MI. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
|
